banner



Why Did Brenden Dassy Makeup The Story?

Fans of the Netflix show "Making a Murderer" haven't held their tongues in criticizing Brendan Dassey's lawyer, Len Kachinsky, and his strategies during the juvenile's initial defense force, only the public defender all the same insists nothing he did had whatsoever effect on the outcome of Dassey's case.

"Frankly, I'm not responsible for Dassey going to prison," Kachinsky told TheWrap. "You can say I fabricated a mistake, that I should've [attended] or I should have rescheduled the interview — that'due south valid criticism."

"Making a Murderer" follows the trial and conviction of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey in the murder of Teresa Halbach, which both Avery and Dassey say they didn't commit. Nevertheless, on Mar. 1, 2006, Dassey confessed in a lengthy interview that he was part of the brutal rape, torture and killing of Halbach, only to retract those statements over the intervening months.

In multiple interviews with investigators and law enforcement thereafter — namely on May 12 and May thirteen — Dassey was being seemingly manipulated by investigators Michael O'Kelly, Tom Fassbender and Marker Wiegart into confessing. And Kachinsky, Dassey'southward appointed lawyer, was criticized for allowing his customer to exist interviewed without legal representation.

For those who oasis't seen "Making a Murderer," the Mar. one video shows Dassey beingness interviewed on a sofa over four and a half hours. The May 12 interrogation is led by Michael O'Kelly, who interviewed Dassey on behalf of Kachinsky. At this point, Dassey'south defense squad was trying to play into Dassey'southward perceived guilt to reduce his own culpability, making him the primary witness confronting Steven Avery. O'Kelly laid out photographs from the criminal offense scene and elicited a confession from Dassey, including a cartoon of what happened in Avery's trailer.

Soon after, O'Kelly calls Kachinsky reporting that the interview went "very well." He then asks whether he should make an appointment with state Department of Justice investigator Tom Fassbender, who along with Marker Wiegart afterward interviews Brendan on May 13. Kachinsky was not present for any of the interviews.

However, Kachinsky clarifies to TheWrap that the only interview used in trial was the Mar. 1 confession — one for which he wasn't present considering he didn't withal represent Dassey, who at the time wasn't a suspect. Kachinsky called criticism of him "unfair."

"Mar. i, 2006, before being arrested, Dassey gives a 4-and-a-half-hour video tape confession to everything," Kachinsky said. "At that place is no other statement from Dassey that was admitted for this trial other than that one. The one with the investigators was unfortunately a piffling rough, but that was never used at Dassey'southward trial."

This is why Kachinsky believes that cipher he did — or didn't practice — had whatever upshot on the outcome of the trial.

"None of the stuff anyone has complained nigh, namely the O'Kelly interview and the ane with Fassbender which occurred in May, none of that was used in trial," he said.

Still, Kachinsky admits that he made a mistake, and that he should have been there at the May 13 interrogation.

"I would have been there apart from the fact that I had Army Reserve duty the mean solar day they wanted to do the interview," he explained. "In xx/twenty hindsight, I should have asked them to delay the interview until the middle of the calendar week when I was going to exist able to make information technology … But information technology would have made no divergence in the consequence of Dassey's case."

Source: https://www.thewrap.com/making-a-murderer-brendan-dasseys-attorney-tells-us-why-hes-not-responsible-for-conviction/

Posted by: robertsonbeirch1984.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Why Did Brenden Dassy Makeup The Story?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel